Lindsay Clancy’s attorney said the juror he claims is preventing a unanimous verdict looked the judge “in the eye and lied” on Thursday, when the juror pledged to follow instructions about proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington said a note from the jury foreperson indicated the holdout juror “made statements acknowledging doubt but refuses to apply it.”
“This person will not apply reasonable doubt to the evidence” and return a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity, Reddington told Judge William Sullivan.
Sullivan disagreed, saying the note “does not indicate this is a person who refuses to follow the law.”
Sullivan declined to conduct a further inquiry of the juror but said he would remind the entire jury it must follow the law whether they like it or not.
Reddington pushed the judge to be more forceful in his instruction.
Sullivan interrupted.
“What do you want me to do, get a brass band?” an exasperated Sullivan said. “I am not glossing over this issue.”
Jurors then filed stoically into the courtroom to begin a seventh day of deliberations.
The judge told jurors not to identify one another in any future notes and reminded them about his instructions after Thursday’s dust-up.
Source link